Our website uses cookies

Cookies help us to understand how you use our website so that we can provide you with the best experience when you are on our site. To find out more, read our privacy policy and cookie policy.

Manage cookies

Please review and manage the Cookie settings below. You can change these settings any time by clicking the "Cookie settings" link in the footer of the page

  1. Essential cookies:
    Necessary for enabling core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.

IE10 and below are not supported.

Contact us for any help on browser support

Strategic Assessment on Climate Change - Discussion Paper - Comments

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link

Below are questions found in the Discussion Paper on the Strategic Assessment of Climate Change.

**Please ensure that you are registered before answering the questions.

Below are questions found in the Discussion Paper on the Strategic Assessment of Climate Change.

**Please ensure that you are registered before answering the questions.

  • Question 1

    Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link
    almost 2 years ago
    The comment period for the discussion paper closed on September 14, 2018.

    For what types of project should upstream GHG emissions be included in the scope of GHG emissions assessed?





  • Question 2

    Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link
    almost 2 years ago
    The comment period for the discussion paper closed on September 14, 2018.

    How should uncertainty related to the analysis of GHG emissions be managed and communicated?



  • Question 3

    Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link
    almost 2 years ago
    The comment period for the discussion paper closed on September 14, 2018.

    What should be the relative importance of emission intensities and absolute emissions?


  • Question 4

    Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link
    almost 2 years ago
    The comment period for the discussion paper closed on September 14, 2018.

    Should project emission intensities be compared to comparable, high-performing and energy‑efficient projects in Canada and internationally?



  • Question 5

    Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link
    almost 2 years ago
    The comment period for the discussion paper closed on September 14, 2018.

    Should avoided emissions be subtracted from a project’s GHG emissions?



  • Question 6

    Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link
    almost 2 years ago
    The comment period for the discussion paper closed on September 14, 2018.

    How should GHG offsets be considered in the impact assessment process?

  • Question 7

    Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link
    almost 2 years ago
    The comment period for the discussion paper closed on September 14, 2018.

    Should carbon leakage considerations enter into a project’s assessment, and if so, how?

  • Question 8

    Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link
    almost 2 years ago
    The comment period for the discussion paper closed on September 14, 2018.

    What criteria should be considered in determining GHG emissions thresholds? What are your views on applying thresholds to determine which projects are on the Project List?



  • Question 9

    Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link
    almost 2 years ago
    The comment period for the discussion paper closed on September 14, 2018.

    What type of information should be required in the early planning phase to support discussions on whether, from a GHG emission perspective, an impact assessment is required?





  • Question 10

    Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link
    almost 2 years ago
    The comment period for the discussion paper closed on September 14, 2018.

    How should the implementation of best available technology / best environmental practices economically achievable be considered in the early planning phase?